Skip to content

Democrats WARN the Supreme Court …

The Democrats have issued a WARNING to the US Supreme Court to not hear a particular case.

An “OR ELSE” is implied.

Led by Senator Whitehouse (RI, D), “The court is too conservative to make a valid ruling on a NYC gun law.”

If this doesn’t make your hair stand on end, you don’t know what’s at stake.


As concealed carry becomes more common …

Members of law enforcement are not the only ones willing to put their lives on the line.

As concealed carry becomes more common law enforcement must accept the fact that armed civilians are very likely to be the first responders, and may be effectively engaging the shooter or even have things under control with the subdued attackers at gunpoint. Law enforcement must cooperate with those civilians.

Just as the civilians have the responsibility to distinguish between the attackers, other first responders, and innocent bystanders, so too must the uniformed police.

To promote the idea that capable civilians should just stay out of the way when their communities (their families and neighbors) are under attack is against the nature, the courage, and capability of the American people.

Veterans know the Supreme Law …

In every community throughout the country are citizens who have military training and combat experience who have not forsworn their oath to defend the country against domestic enemies. We know the supreme law, The Constitution.

From privates to sergeant majors, butter bars to 4-stars, and seamen to admirals, we are the best trained militia on the planet.

We are tacticians, snipers, tank drivers, pilots, special forces, riflemen, explosives experts, missile technicians, communications specialists, medics, and ingenious problem solvers. If necessary, we could commandeer anything we need. If necessary, we can capture or kill anyone.

It is against the law to disarm us.

You government officials, mayors, chiefs of police, governors, and legislators who think you are in control and protected from the wrath of The American People, … you haven’t thought it through. Ask King George III how doubling down on the oppressive measures worked out. He was lucky he was several thousand miles away. … You’re not.

If wayward, oath-breaking officials go too far and all legal efforts to restore The People’s RIGHTS are exhausted, I am confident the veterans would answer a call to arms to restore The Constitution. It’s our duty.

It’s on our minds.

End Abortion Throughout The United States

The deception is over. Despite what almost every woman will claim about HER abortion, not all 60,000,000+ abortions were prescribed for medical necessity.

The convoluted, tortured opinion written by Blackmun in Roe v Wade in 1973 (the free love era) gave the irresponsible people an out – “for reasons of health”. Add “right to privacy” to that and women and unscrupulous doctors ran with it. It wasn’t long before abortion mills made an appearance. Since then, men and women have avoided the foreseeable consequences of their sexual activity and used abortion as a contraceptive.

Heartbeat – no longer a collection of cells, but evidence of a human being in development. He’s alive.

Late term abortions which result in a live birth are evidence of attempted murder. In such cases the child was always viable and healthy, and the pregnancy was healthy. There was no medical necessity.

There is a huge moral chasm between people who accept the consequences of their actions and people who are willing to kill to avoid them.

Many legislators defend abortion, even promote it, not because they approve of it but because it guarantees votes. Women who have had abortions might be single-issue voters. When abortion is outlawed and the issue doesn’t exist, how will they vote?

States are choosing to be “baby kill” states or “baby sanctuary” states. Women, abortion-prescribing doctors, and abortionists will simply cross state lines.

Like slavery, abortion is intolerable. “Baby kill” states and “baby sanctuary” states cannot exist side by side.

End abortion throughout the United States.

Reviving the Paris Agreement …

Everyday, the Global Leftists write articles trying to connect EVERYTHING we do to global warming, and how in simply living our lives we are endangering EVERYTHING.

All of this to convince Americans (just Americans, the other nations really don’t matter) that global warming is manmade. They do it for one reason: to return to the Paris Agreement.

The Paris Agreement is simply a plan to redistribute America’s wealth to the world. All of the other countries are very much on board with that! Of Course.

President Trump was right to withdraw America from the Paris Agreement. He acted in America’s best interest. Why he did it is obvious if you ——–

Read The Paris Agreement.

Note which parties “shall” do something, and which parties “may” do something.

(In legalese, “Shall” means it is not optional, it’s mandatory. “May” means it’s optional.)

“developed country parties”
will provide to
“developing country parties”

enhanced support
continuous enhanced support
progressive (continuously increasing)
address poverty
PUBLIC FUNDS – (that means, fund the wealth transfer by taxing us)

The transfer of wealth is mentioned throughout the Agreement – because That Is Its Purpose.

“As part of a global effort, developed country Parties should continue to take the lead in mobilizing climate FINANCE from a wide variety of sources, instruments and channels, noting the significant role of PUBLIC FUNDS, through a variety of actions, including supporting country-driven strategies, and taking into account the needs and priorities of developing country Parties. Such mobilization of climate FINANCE should represent a progression beyond previous efforts.

“Taking full account of the specific needs and special situations of the least developed countries with regard to FUNDING …”

And – what does climate change have to do with the following? (pg 3) It reads like a liberal activist’s shopping list. They used a bunch of liberal trigger words.

“Acknowledging that climate change is a common concern of humankind, Parties should, when taking action to address climate change, respect, promote and consider their respective obligations on human rights, the right to health, the rights of indigenous peoples, local communities, migrants, children, persons with disabilities and people in vulnerable situations and the right to development, as well as gender equality, empowerment of women and intergenerational equity, …”

Gender equality? Children? Well of course, any liberal hoax has to mention the little children to trigger the emotions. I’m surprised they didn’t mention puppies.

” … may be enhanced and strengthened, as determined by the Conference of the Parties …” (They will vote to increase our share of the burden.)

” … global effort … mobilization of climate finance should represent a progression beyond previous efforts …” (The transfer of wealth should increase every year.)

I encourage you to read the entire document. It is only 27 pages with wide margins and a lot of space between short paragraphs.

It is a BLATANT plan to redistribute America’s wealth to the world.

Manmade Climate Change is a scam.

The text

Maintain a credible, tacit threat …

The People can only maintain a credible, tacit threat to resist a future rogue government if we have modern weapons.

The 2nd Amendment states that it’s The People’s duty to protect the free state and tasks them with that duty. You can only resist tyranny if you have arms suitable for revolution.

That is more important than any anti-gun fear.

The People can protect themselves and their communities. Promote it.
An Armed Society Is A Polite Society”.

Right now we have a president who protects The Bill of Rights. We could have gotten Hillary, and she would have taken unconstitutional action against the 1st and 2nd Amendments and used the government against The People and forced us to organize a violent resistance.

Keep your ARs and AKs and your high capacity magazines. There are more Hillary’s in our future.

Mueller – no criminal conduct found

After two years Mueller couldn’t find evidence of criminal conduct. Maybe the Dems needed four years, or eight.

How long ago did they conduct the last interview or collect the last bit of information?

Could the same report have been released a year ago?

How much contact did Mueller’s office have with the Dems?

Did Mueller’s office ever indicate to the Dems that they had NOTHING a year ago?

Was Mueller pressured to delay releasing the report?

Did the Dems indicate to Mueller’s office they wanted the controversy to continue?

How much money went into the investigation? Was any outside funding involved? Did any kind of funding continue after their last effort to collect evidence?